Post image for Middle Managers Get No Respect!

Middle Managers Get No Respect!

by Robert Tanner on February 28, 2011

The late Rodney Dangerfield was a great comedian who talked about how he never got no respect. We are fortunate that modern technology preserves his comedic genius and allows us to still enjoy his no respect routine.  Middle managers can relate to Rodney Dangerfield–only they are not always laughing.  Though they are managers of managers, middle managers get little respect.  Though they are critical to an organization’s success, middle managers get little respect. Though their jobs are difficult, middle managers get little respect.  Like Rodney Dangerfield, middle managers get no respect!

Understanding the evolving middle management role and leveraging it effectively, however, is critical to an organization’s success. Given the volatile and complex nature of business, it is time to take another look at middle managers.

Being in the middle is tough wherever it occurs!  In a family, the oldest child often has more responsibility and power and the baby has everyone’s attention.  The middle child is left with this undefined role lacking the power of her older sibling and lacking the attention that her younger sibling gets from everyone.  In organizations it is no different.

Senior executives have the power. They set the organizational policy and strategic direction.  Front-line managers work directly with the customers and get the attention of the organization in resource allocation decisions.  The middle manager is left with bridging the gap between the senior executives and the front-line managers. Often, it can be a thankless job particularly if there are problems with the organizational policy and strategic direction.  In these situations, the middle manager often becomes the target of lower level frustration.

Middle managers have to make the executive agenda happen but they are often neglected in organizational development and training initiatives.  Also, organizations frequently give more attention to the senior and front line management levels.   There is further proof of the lack of respect for middle managers:  middle managers are often hit the hardest in times of organizational layoffs.  The lucky (or unlucky) middle managers who do happen to keep their jobs are left with more responsibilities, less resources, and a role that is more stressful and complex.

Research supports this view.  In the Development Dimensions International report on middle managers, Put Your Money in the Middle, DDI finds that the Great Recession has significantly impacted middle management:

  • Their ranks  have shrunk.
  • Their loyalty to organizations has declined.
  • They are stressed.
  • Their responsibilities have grown.
  • They will be hit hardest by the Baby Boomer retirements.

Despite the lack of respect they get in organizations, middle managers are the natural pipeline to vacant C-Level positions.  Also, middle managers are the primary implementers of the senior executive agenda.  Given these functions, their role is critical to business.  In fact, as Paul Osterman notes in his book, The Truth About Middle Managers, many middle managers today function more like general managers or senior leaders of old.  With the flattening of organizations and technological advances, the scope of the middle management function has grown over time not diminished.

What do you think? Is the job of a middle manager difficult?  Do they get enough organizational attention?

[contemplate1]

About the Author

Robert Tanner is the founder of the Management is a Journey Blog and Principal Consultant at Business Consulting Solutions LLC. He is a certified change management consultant, management mentor, trainer, and an Adjunct Professor of Management. Robert has a passion for helping managers and leaders fulfill their potential. Connect with Robert on Google+ and Twitter. To join the mailing list, subscribe here.

Josephson Institute - Business Ethics and Leadership March 2, 2011 at 5:05 pm

No person is smart enough and no company is good enough to avoid mistakes. Good leaders and excellent companies are smart enough to not make things worse. Great leaders and extraordinary companies find ways to transform setbacks into growing strengths. – Michael Josephson

Robert Tanner March 2, 2011 at 7:22 pm

Agreed, Michael, our best learning actually comes from our mistakes. Organizational learning occurs when senior leaders and operational managers use mistakes as opportunities to improve existing business practices. Thanks for leaving a comment.

Robert

David Bussell March 15, 2011 at 6:23 am

If middle managers are looking for recognition and respect, they can look downstream to find it. A gifted supervisor will earn the respect of their direct reports through the demonstration of sincerity, consistency, and objectivity. They may not always be loved at work, but they will be respected. If the upper management’s view of your value is obscurred by bureacracy, politics, or simple banality, it’s their loss. A manager that can see the work through the haze and can inspire their staff to do the tasks at hand is a success.

Robert Tanner March 16, 2011 at 4:06 am

David,

First, thanks for leaving a comment! You make an excellent point. Middle managers can and should focus on what they have the power to do in an organization. And, if they are not appreciated by upper management for their talent, middle managers can develop productive relationships with their direct reports and focus their efforts there. They can focus on those who do appreciate them and look for opportunities to excel and prove “the critics” wrong with organizational results. This is emotionally intelligent thinking. Jobs are not easy to come by currently. Hope to hear from you again!

Regards,

Robert

Previous post:

Next post: